Sunday, June 28, 2009

India Media Goes Gay-Indian Express Coverage , June 28, 2009

HI All

I am amazed at the coverage almost all  major papers have given to LGBT issues. Happy and gay times ahead. Have compiled most of it for you according to the papers they were published in. Here goes Indian Express coverage

Regards

Ketan

 

In the name of LOVE

Post Comment

http://m4.zedo.com/log/p.gif?a=590544;g=0;c=758000991;x=3840;n=758;i=0;e=i;s=162;z=%5Btimestamp%5D

 

http://promo.expressindia.com/adsnew264/www/delivery/avw.php?zoneid=58&cb=INSERT_RANDOM_NUMBER_HERE&n=a7c04a24

  Posted: Sunday , Jun 28, 2009 at 1050 hrs IST

Love

http://static.indianexpress.com/frontend/iep/images/discussion_bot_bg1.gif

As the LGBT community takes out Pride Marches today in Chennai, Delhi and Bangalore, we bring you love stories that’ve blossomed in, and despite, our cities

KARMIC CONNECTION
Kolkata

The city’s considerable number of gay cruising joints didn’t facilitate Debjyoti and Manty’s romance. Theirs was a love story nurtured in its cafes, restaurants and movie theatres, places that most straight couples frequent. And never once did this obviously gay couple feel out of place. “In fact, apart from our first meeting at an LGBT film festival, we have rarely visited the so-called gay-friendly places. We have an amazing ability to make ourselves comfortable everywhere. There was a lot of public display of affection but no one seemed to care,” says Manty, 29, a doctor.
Their first meetings, like all great love stories, involved common friends and a karmic connection. “It was the closing of the film festival, two years ago. I had gone to meet a friend of mine, who was with his other friends. One of them was Manty,” says Debjyoti, 25, who was a student of law then. “The moment I saw him, I had this strange feeling. It was as if I had seen him before and I wanted to know more about him. It turned out that we had crossed each other’s paths a few months ago, when he was walking down the road with the common friend of ours. Our faces had been kind of imprinted on each other’s minds, and we connected,” he says.
A series of meetings with common friends followed — “They were more like chaperones,” insists Manty—before both were ready to take the relationship to the second level. “It was nice that we were taking things slow. Generally, most gay relationships are about quick gratification. The period of courtship was reassuring because emotionally speaking, I was at a crossroads in my life. Some people were becoming dearer to me than others, but no one seemed to be striking me as the one,” says Debjyoti.
After a month and a half, Manty asked Debjyoti out and proposed on the very first date. “I knew he was the one for me. He was gregarious without being overbearing. And there was so much honesty in his eyes,” says Manty.
But like many love stories, there was a stumbling block, in this case Manty’s career plans. “Within a few months of our relationship, he moved to Russia for further studies. I was quite pessimistic about our future,” says Debjyoti. Their relationship, however, weathered even the Siberian winter. “We would call each other almost every day and run up an astronomical bill. But things are better now because he visits quite often and we spend quality time together,” says Debjyoti.
Manty is visiting Kolkata now, and the glow on Debjyoti’s face is quite evident. “We have a lot of catching up to do,” he says. So what does the future hold for them? “As of now, we are quite happy with the way things are but I know we will have to take some concrete steps. I will have to come out to my parents for one. And that’s something I am really apprehensive about, more so, because they are so conservative,” says Manty. Debjyoti, however, has no such problem. “Initially things were a bit rocky with my parents, but things settled down, and till now, it has been a lot of fun! Manty has been accepted as another son of the family,” he says.
Will they participate in this year’s pride march on July 5? “I most definitely will. The Pride March is, truly, a mark of pride and freedom for me. It goes to show how ready the city is to accept certain changes at least on the face of it. Internal changes always take longer than external changes, but it’s a start!” says Debjyoti.
—Premankur Biswas

IRLS, UNINTERRUPTED
Mumbai

Finding love was not on top of her list when Meghna, a 30-year-old school teacher, moved to Mumbai from a small town in Uttarakhand to study. She saw it more as a career challenge. When she bumped into Anandita at a film festival hosted by a queer group in Mumbai, though, she could not deny the instant attraction she felt for her.
Anandita was 34, a photographer from Kolkata who had moved to the city to earn a living. Like Meghna, she too was dealing with demons of relationships gone sour. But they clicked—over films, dinners and travel. After a year of seeing each other, Anandita moved in with Meghna. They have been together for six years now. “I didn’t think we would be together this long. Finding a soulmate is not easy, especially in such a big a city. I think Meghna and I clicked because we both felt the desire to stick together,” says Anandita.
While Anandita’s father has accepted their relationship, it’s not always easy, the couple says, to live a “normal life” in a homophobic society. “Not having any partnership rights makes it difficult for couples to settle down. Recently we were looking to buy a house together but the bank only acknowledges either blood or marital relationships,” says Anandita.
For Meghna, what hurts is the lack of acknowledgement of their relationship, from anyone other than friends. “It makes it harder to cope in difficult situations. Besides this the fact that we are considered only good friends by my parents is something I have to deal with daily. They expect me to find a partner in someone else, a man. I want to be able to tell them I have already found my partner,” she says.
The two get away with living together as friends, for now—and sharing their lives. They hang out at Carter Road promenade, discos, pubs, and at friends’ parties. They have to be careful when they are in public. “Two lesbians may face discrimination when they are seen as a couple. You get harassed on the street the moment you are affectionate or intimate with a same-sex partner,” she says.
Meghna is a foodie and loves to go to restaurants that serve authentic cuisine. When they travel, she is always interested in where they will eat. Both end up cooking for each other and Anandita has taught Meghna many dishes. The former is a big film buff though her taste in horror films doesn’t impress Meghna.
Do they fight, we ask? “Yes,” they say together. Sometimes it is about ideological stuff or strategies of fighting for queer rights. Since they are both opinionated, neither backs down for the longest time. They also fight when jealous. “Are you so interested in her that you do not want to spend time with me?”
What does the future hold for them? “Not marriage but we hope to move into a new home. Get a dog and maybe later on raise a child,” says Meghna.

—Georgina Maddox
(Mmbai’s Pride March is on Aug16)

SHALL WE DANCE?
Chennai

The first time Kalki saw Santhosh at her friend’s house, she didn’t like him. “I was dancing to a sexy item number and I could see from his face that he didn’t like it. So it was only natural that I didn’t like him either. But I wanted to win him over,” says Kalki. Santhosh probably wanted the same thing and they met the next day at a mutual friend’s music store. They became fast friends and were soon inseparable. This was 10 years ago, before Sabari had had a sex-change operation, before she turned Kalki and founded the Sahodari Foundation, an organisation aimed towards the socio-economic advancement of the transgender community in Tamil Nadu.
Now in their early 30s, Kalki and Santhosh are still going strong. Their families have known each other from the first day that Kalki presented Santhosh with one of her watercolours. “When his mother saw the painting, she wanted to meet me. Since then, our families are good friends,” she says.
Kalki began her activism in her teens and was named one of the ten youth icons of Chennai by Ananda Vikatan, a popular Tamil magazine, earlier this year. She also received a Lifetime Achievement Award from the Lioness Club of Chennai last year. After an MA in Journalism and Mass Communication from Madurai University, Kalki is now pursuing a second MA in International Relations from Annamalai University. Santhosh has his own agricultural business. They meet every day but have chosen not to live together. “In the beginning when we used to live in the same conservative town, we lived with our respective families. And even though I am now living on my own, we like to keep it that way. Living together has its own traps and although he is my soulmate, we don’t want to feel bound to each other,” says Kalki.
Kalki recalls their first kiss with a blush. “It was a full moon night. He took me out for a bike ride very far from our town. I took the chance to ask him if he would marry me if I changed my sex and became a woman. He said yes and he kissed me soon after,” she says. Kalki and Santhosh have no plans of marrying any time soon. “We have our individual identities. I am a social worker and activist and am involved in cultural projects as well,” says Kalki who will soon make her celluloid debut in a Tamil film. “It is just enough for us to know that we want to be together,” she says.

—Anushree Majumdar

HEART LAND
Delhi

“I can draw an entire map of romance trails in Delhi,” says Ponni Arasu. The 25-year-old lawyer is one of the key organisers of Delhi’s Queer Pride March. Her fondest memories of the city are of the years when she had just come out of the closet. “I came out to my parents in my first year of college at Lady Shriram. I’d fallen in love with a girl and I told my mother about it,” says Arasu.
With her partner, Priya Thangarajah, 27, she has been running around to finalise every small detail for the march. Although Delhi celebrates its second Pride March today, Arasu and Priya remember another day in October 2005, when Anjuman, a queer collective in JNU, organised the Pink Triangle Day, where about 40-50 students marched with a big triangle in pink and the rainbow flag. “That was the first Pride March on the campus. I met Priya through a friend while I was at JNU and both of us had formed Anjuman with other queer students. JNU at that time was not completely okay with alternative sexuality,” says Arasu. In the midst of the university’s political turbulence, where queer groups joined the Left-wing to edge out the right-wing puritans, Arasu and Priya found each other and stayed together.
It’s been over five years since then. And although they’re based in Bangalore now, Delhi holds memories of finding each other and charting their love in the streets of CR Park, the dirt tracks at Lodhi Garden and the old lanes leading up to Jama Masjid. “The city is full of little corners, of memories. To sit on the steps of Jama Masjid, holding hands with my lover, in an atmosphere where homosexuality is viewed as a sin, I cannot begin to describe the thrill,” says Arasu.
But along with the experience of discovering love in the city, what has kept Arasu and Priya busy is the need to create queer spaces in the city. Arasu was instrumental in creating Nigah, a cultural queer collective in. “Back then, Sarai used to organise the Siddharth Gautam Film Festival where queer films used to be screened and it was quite the thing, to take somebody there and patao them. Today when we see an auditorium filled with over 200 people at the Nigah Film Festival, it’s a great feeling. We’re coming full circle,” says Arasu.
—Anushree Majumdar

A LOT CAN HAPPEN OVER COFFEE
Bangalore

It is a truth universally acknowledged that a single gay man in possession of good sense must ask another out for a cup of coffee. One day, at a meeting at Good As You (GAY), a social queer group in the city, Mayank noticed a young man being rather vocal about his opinions during a group discussion. A business card was exchanged but no calls were forthcoming. Mayank decided to step up to the plate and asked the young man out, only to be refused. “That’s because I couldn’t handle the surprise of being asked out,” says Shankar, who made up for his blunder by fixing up a meeting with Mayank the next evening. “That was on 26 September 2004 and we have been meeting each other every day since then,” says Mayank. Their tradition of the coffee date continues as they celebrate this year’s Pride March in Bangalore.
Corny as it sounds, the path of true love has never been easy. Mayank was married at 25, the marriage did not last. Coming out was not only a priority, it had become a necessity. “I had to come out to myself, my family in order to set my life (in order) and my sexual priorities. So here I was gay, divorced and a new born person,” he says. An entrepreneur in the service industry, he did not let his divorce deter him and has chosen to share his experience with queer friends, counselling those who come to GAY.
For someone who had no plans of coming out, explaining homosexuality to his parents in the vernacular was an experience Shankar, a consultant in a multi-national corporation, had not bargained for. “But my involvement in the GAY activities busted myths of homosexuality. The pressure of getting married and lying to a girl I was supposed to meet convinced me to come out of the closet,” he says.
In the meantime, their relationship has gone from strength to strength. They spread their coffee dates across the city —Koshy’s,
Airlines Restaurant and Caramel. Sometimes, they also go to a party at one of Bangalore’s premier club houses, while meeting for movies and plays. “We make sure we go on one holiday a year. We have recently been to Shanghai. We also do domestic trips that ranges from my native Ajmer to his native Trichy,” says Mayank. While Mayank likes Shankar’s practical head, what ties the latter to Mayank is his patience and calm.
And being in Bangalore has been a blessing, affirms the couple. “People are neutral to the entire concept. Although there have been stray instances of extortion, majority of the people live in peace. There is no concept of a ‘gay couple’ still in India. So, we don’t portray that identity as we go along. Any gay explorer will find his way in the city. Bangalore lets an individual live his identity. One chooses either to be in disguise or be out there in open,” say the boys.
All we can say: Those looking for love, don’t kick the power of ’em magic beans. (Names changed on request)
_Anushree Majumdar

Govt works to repeal law against homosexuality

Amitabh Sinha Posted online: Sunday , Jun 28, 2009 at 0303 hrs

New Delhi : The government is said to be actively working to “repeal” the controversial Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code — drafted in Victorian India — that criminalises homosexuality.

Highly places sources confirmed to The Sunday Express that Home Minister P Chidambaram, Law Minister M Veerappa Moily and Health Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad are scheduled to meet soon to evolve a consensus on the repeal.

“This section is an absurdity in today’s world. The government will certainly move to repeal it,” said a top government functionary.

The previous UPA government was unable to come to a conclusion following stiff resistance from former Home Minister Shivraj Patil and sections of the Congress’s allies with some of them arguing that certain communities were strongly opposed to lifting the ban on the grounds of religion.

A petition challenging the section is pending in the Delhi High Court. While some have challenged it on medical grounds arguing that the ban prevents many gays from receiving AIDS treatment, others have said that it’s discriminatory and, therefore, a violation of human rights guaranteed under the Constitution.

The previous Health Minister Anbumani Ramadoss had favoured legalising homosexuality and removing discrimination against other vulnerable sections like sex workers to contain the spread of HIV. Patil, on the other hand, had said that such a move would increase criminalisation and encourage child abuse.

Prime Minister Manmohan Singh then directed the ministers to resolve their differences. The High Court, too, told the government to sort out the matter at the earliest.

With both Patil and Ramadoss and some of the allies who opposed the ban out of the way, sources said, decks have now been cleared.

Chidambaram and Moily are known to be firmly in favour of striking down the law. Azad’s views are not clearly known but sources said he was unlikely to oppose the move.

“It should have been done long ago. The provisions are beyond any reason or logic. But now since there is a consensus emerging on the issue, the decision to repeal is only a matter of time,” said the source.

 

 

Email: moderator@gaybombay.in

Web Sites:

www.gaybombay.in

www.gaybombay.info

www.gayindia.org

E Groups:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gay_bombay

http://groups.google.com/group/Gaybombay


GB Internet Radio

http://www.gaybombay.in/gbradio

Gaybombay breaking news and annoucements

http://labs.google.co.in/smschannels/subscribe/Gaybombay

Emergency Helpline number 9820565885

Orkut:

http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Community.aspx?cmm=22091955 

 Blogs:

http://gaybombay.blogspot.com

http://gaybombay.wordpress.com 

Twitter

http://twitter.com/gaybombay

 

apologies.. ht coverage--June 28, 2009

Hi

 

In my earlier email.. which compiled ht coverage of lgbt issues in today’s addition, the subject line said june 29 please read it as as june 28,2009

 

Regards

Ketan

 

Email: moderator@gaybombay.in

Web Sites:

www.gaybombay.in

www.gaybombay.info

www.gayindia.org

E Groups:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gay_bombay

http://groups.google.com/group/Gaybombay


GB Internet Radio

http://www.gaybombay.in/gbradio

Gaybombay breaking news and annoucements

http://labs.google.co.in/smschannels/subscribe/Gaybombay

Emergency Helpline number 9820565885

Orkut:

http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Community.aspx?cmm=22091955 

 Blogs:

http://gaybombay.blogspot.com

http://gaybombay.wordpress.com 

Twitter

http://twitter.com/gaybombay

 

India media goes gay- Hindustan Times LGBT Coverage on Juen 29, 2009

HI All

I am amazed at the coverage almost all  major papers have given to LGBT issues. Happy and gay times ahead. Have compiled most of it for you according to the papers they were published in. Here goes Hindustan Times coverage

Regards

Ketan

 

Out of the closet, on to the streets

Ashok Row Kavi

Email Author

June 27, 2009

First Published: 22:25 IST(27/6/2009)

Last Updated: 22:33 IST(27/6/2009)

 

On July 2, exactly a decade ago, 15 men met in Kolkata’s badly maintained Park Circus Park. It started drizzling the moment we assembled and all of us ran to seek shelter in a dilapidated gazebo standing forlornly in a corner. But those were exciting times and the ‘fabulous 15’ set off for what was then called the ‘Rainbow Walk’. The plan was to follow a leisurely trail visiting officials, NGOs, judges and all those who matter and tell them what we were all about. ‘We’ here being faggots, gay men, g*ndus, naan-khatais, gud — whatever you want to call us homosexuals.

It was a pretty rag-tag bunch, wearing similar yellow t-shirts with the legend ‘Walk on the Rainbow’ printed in pink letters (what else) saying it all. The t-shirts had been printed and packed lovingly by a giant gay man called Owais Khan who worked for a corporate in Bangalore. Nearly all of us had made it to Kolkata on our own steam and had been picked up by the quiet Kolkatan called Pawan Dhall from Howrah terminus, a whirlpool of perpetual chaos.

But the most memorable part of that ‘Walk on the Rainbow’ was being stopped by a grand old Bengali Maashi Maa (auntie) and asked: “What on earth are you guys walking around for?” to which I replied, “Oh, we are homosexuals and we are asking the government to get rid of Section 377 of the Indian Penal Code.”

After seeing the rather puzzled look on her face, I explained what the whole enterprise was all about. “You see,” I said patiently, “there is this really awful law that says that anal or oral sex is against the law of nature and must be punished with 10 years in jail even if both parties consent to it.” Before I could explain further, I had an outraged Bengali lady on my hands: “You mean to say that this useless government has nothing to do but peep into everybody’s sex life? You mean even your bottom is not your own?” She seemed to be getting really mad as she pronounced the Bengali street word for buttocks in well-rounded contempt.

It’s then that I realised that India’s heart is good and gracious. The kind of homophobia I would see in New York or London was just missing even in a hide-bound great city like Kolkata. But was it really that easy? I wasn’t sure.

As a street counselor in my organisation, Humsafar Trust and my experience manning the Trust’s helpline in Mumbai, I had talked to scores of young men and women who were puzzled first and then traumatised when they learnt about their sexual orientation and tried willy-nilly to adjust to mainstream society. It wasn’t that easy specially because there was no homophobia of the Western type here. Nobody in India really took homosexuality seriously till you refused to get married and insisted on making everybody’s life miserable by defying social norms of dress or composure.

That was the issue as the Indian middle class faced a new phenomenon — whole segments of population whose only common trait was that they loved the same sex. It was exactly like a teacher or parent seeing that a child was writing using its left hand. And just as nobody now sees that as a problem, one wondered why this business of sexual orientation had become such an issue. But obviously it was an issue. As the days passed, not only were there horror stories of young men and women being forcibly married, sent for psychotherapy and aversion therapy, but they were also being beaten, caned, injected with hormones, sent to ashrams to be changed through ‘lessons in morality’, called scum of the earth by priests — and sometimes even driven out of homes. What was the issue?

It was obvious that sexual orientation and gender identity were not easy subjects to handle. Neither schools nor colleges had any inkling on how to do that through sex education. Even most parents didn’t have the skills to explain to a child why he or she shouldn’t be attracted to somebody of his or her own sex.

In that respect, I was a lucky guy — my father not only didn’t bat an eyelid when I said I was attracted to other boys, but he even went and got whatever literature on the subject he could get for a nerdish kid; I still have the two volumes of Havelock Ellis with me as a gift on my 12th birthday.

At the Humsafar Trust, the stories tumbled out along with the men carrying them like a huge burden — rejection by family and friends, violence in public spaces for being ‘different’ and being blackmailed by goons and the police using an archaic law that was rarely used. What seemed to be used were a set of nebulous laws that supposedly maintained “social order and threats to public order”. As the net widened, I heard of cross-dressers being beaten and raped by the police and goons, and young men being raped by stronger male relatives. It looked like the law was a beautiful carpet under which crawled a whole lot of worms.

What one concluded was that homosexuals (the term includes lesbians) and cross dressers were persecuted because they were ‘not natural’, which, of course, was an oxymoron. The point was — was this new? Every homosexual thinks he’s the only one alive but as the years go by and you seek out others like you, things get a lot easier.

So then I started digging into history and all sorts of texts surprised me; from Socrates and Plato to Alexander the Great, there definitely seemed a whole lot of “us” way back in time. In India, personal histories came in with Islam and all the way from Mehmud Ghazni to Allauddin Khilji and Babar, homosexuals were very much present. This historical perspective gave an idea that homosexuality or homosexuals were not foreign but desi to boot. The nearer one got, the more complicated it became. One couldn’t name, say, any Khan in Bollywood because that practically amounted to dragging them out of their closets which was unethical.

The British in India brought in their own laws and prejudices. Section 377 originated in 17th century Britain and was introduced into the secular criminal codes from ecclesiastical statutes existing in the St James Bible. Before that, we never had such a law even under a bigot like Aurangzeb. The personal in India had remained personal till the British invented both the closet and the law to keep you in it. And the irony is that even though they have rid themselves of this law in 1969, it still lingers in all their former colonies.

Unlike other minorities, sexual minorities will remain minorities by their very nature. They are a reminder that society is a pluralistic multitude and that each of us are different yet equal.

Pride Marches throughout the world are the key to a society where each person is valued for who he or she is, without asking for anything in return. India’s LGBT community is slowly coming of age and will not go back into the closet. That’s for sure.

Ashok Row Kavi is founder-chairman of the Humsafar Trust and a gay rights activist.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print.aspx?Id=dd6ebe52-c593-4738-ad5b-5088072990b6

© Copyright 2007 Hindustan Times

Press Trust Of India

New Delhi, June 27, 2009

First Published: 20:59 IST(27/6/2009)

Last Updated: 21:00 IST(27/6/2009)

Gay community welcomes possibility of repeal of IPC section 377

The news that government is considering repealing a law which criminalises homosexuality has brought cheers among the Gay community which is busy preparing for the second edition of Queer parade on Sunday.

"This is the best thing that can happen at this moment. It will reflect in the Gay Pride march which will take place tomorrow," Lok Prakash, managing trustee of National MSM and Human Rights Task Force here.

Gay rights activists are excited about the news that government is considering repealing section 377 of the IPC, paving the way for decriminalisation of homosexuality in the country. However, they are waiting for a response of the Delhi High Court where a case is still going on.

"We think it's fantastic. Instead of repealing why not change it completely. This section came into existence during British rule. It should have been done earlier," said a gay journalist who did not wish to reveal his identity.

"Atrocities of police on the gay community will stop if this section is repealed. HIV AIDS problem in the community can also be tackled as people will be more open to discussing their sexuality. If taken, it will a fantastic decision," said Arvind Narain, a lawyer and gay rights activist based in Bangalore.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print.aspx?Id=d12a032e-3d98-4149-9a37-d01a9edeaadc

© Copyright 2007 Hindustan Times

After 150 years, consensus nears on making homosexuality legal

Nagendar Sharma, Hindustan Times

New Delhi, June 28, 2009

First Published: 01:04 IST(28/6/2009)

Last Updated: 02:08 IST(28/6/2009

Ahead of annual marches by gays and lesbians in many Indian cities on Sunday, there is good news for them — having sex may no longer be a crime.

Signalling a major shift in its once-unyielding stand, the government has for the first time indicated it is willing to review a controversial 150- year-old law that makes homosexuality a criminal offence.

A meeting between the Home, Health and Law ministers is likely to be convened soon to discuss the issue of either completely repealing or amending section 377 of the Indian Penal Code (IPC), which provides for 10 years imprisonment for “unnatural sex”. That includes homosexuality. 

“The issue was being discussed in Ministry of Home Affairs and Health Ministry and it will come before the Law Ministry also,” said union Law Minister M. Veerappa Moily. “The Home minister will convene a meeting of the three ministers soon.”

Earlier this month, Moily said “some sections of the IPC are outdated and may require a fresh look.”

Home Minister P. Chidambaram will chair the meeting, which is likely to evolve a fresh stand acceptable to all three ministries.

The flexibility in the government stand follows the change of guard in all the three key ministries.

While Chidambaram and Moily are understood to be in favour of  a fresh look on the issue, Health Minister Ghulam Nabi Azad hasn’t yet revealed what he thinks.  

Previous Home and Law ministers Shivraj Patil and H. R. Bhardwaj strongly opposed any change in the controversial IPC section.

“The purpose of section 377 IPC was to provide a healthy environment in the society by criminalising unnatural sexual activities against the order of nature. The Health ministry is welcome to take all steps for ensuring better health of the people, but no tampering with well laid down legal procedure can be allowed without a firm reasoning,” Bhardwaj had told HT in October last year.

Continued from Page 1

This was why the UPA government in its first term refused a proposal from former Health Minister Dr Anbumani Ramadoss to make gay sex legal.

The Health ministry had argued that the provisions of the existing law “push HIV people underground, which makes such risky sexual practices go unnoticed”.

The Home and Health ministries had taken opposite stands last year, in their replies to the Delhi high court, on a petition filed by an NGO called the Naaz Foundation.

The Home ministry had strongly opposed any change in the IPC, while the Health ministry was in favour of scrapping the controversial section.

The scales were finally tilted in favour of the Home ministry when the law ministry supported its stand and made it clear that the government was not in favour of any change in the existing law. 

The arguments in the Delhi high court are complete and the verdict is expected soon.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/StoryPage/Print.aspx?Id=866ecefc-9d70-4f7e-9da8-36af4ccbe3a2

© Copyright 2007 Hindustan Times

 

 

Email: moderator@gaybombay.in

Web Sites:

www.gaybombay.in

www.gaybombay.info

www.gayindia.org

E Groups:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gay_bombay

http://groups.google.com/group/Gaybombay


GB Internet Radio

http://www.gaybombay.in/gbradio

Gaybombay breaking news and annoucements

http://labs.google.co.in/smschannels/subscribe/Gaybombay

Emergency Helpline number 9820565885

Orkut:

http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Community.aspx?cmm=22091955 

 Blogs:

http://gaybombay.blogspot.com

http://gaybombay.wordpress.com 

Twitter

http://twitter.com/gaybombay

 

India media goes gay--- Times Of India LGBT stories on June 28.2009

HI All

I am amazed at the coverage almost all  major papers have given to LGBT issues. Happy and gay times ahead. Have compiled most of it for you according to the papers they were published in. Here goes the Times Of India coverage

Regards

Ketan

From Times of India

Anti-gay law may be changed soon

Two Key Ministers In Favour, Rigid Home Ministry Alters Stand On Repealing Sec 377

Vishwa Mohan | TNN


New Delhi: The government is planning to repeal the law that criminalises homosexuality. The home ministry, which has consistently opposed any change in Section 377 of the IPC that treats private consensual sex between same-sex adults as a crime, appears to have changed its stand.
    Home minister P Chidambaram is learnt to have expressed his views favouring the repeal of Section 377 to his officials. This is in contrast to his predecessor Shivraj Patil, who doggedly refused to make any change in a 150-year-old law that was introduced in India by the British, but junked in Britain 40 years ago.
    Chidambaram’s approach is significant as the home ministry has been a stumbling block so far in any attempt to change the law. Law minister Veerappa Moily has said he favours a “review’’. The health ministry—whose assent is a must to amend Section 377—has historically favoured a repeal.
    Sources in the home ministry said Chidambaram, in order to speed up the matter, will soon take it up with Moily and health minister Ghulam Nabi Azad at a joint meeting and seek their “formal’’ views. The opinion of state governments will also be sought, the sources added.
    Officials in the ministry believe that since the law minister too seems to be in favour of changing the law, the government’s stand before the Delhi high court, which is considering a petition challenging arrests under Section 377, may now change. Although the court has finished hearing arguments on the 2001 petition by the non-profit group, Naz Foundation, the matter can be taken up afresh.
    “If there is consensus over repealing the law or bringing in some suitable changes to decriminalize homosexual relationships, the ministry can submit before the court that it has changed its position and ask for
    hearings to be reopened,’’ said a senior officer.
    Earlier, the home ministry’s position was that homosexuality is not accepted by Indian society and repealing the law would open the floodgates for delinquent behaviour. It also argued that this was the only law that could be applied in cases of child abuse and male rape.
    The health ministry, on the other hand, had argued that homosexuals are vulnerable to HIV/AIDS, hence the discrimination against them should end.
    The home ministry is now waiting to see whether new health minister Azad favours his ministry’s earlier stand. A final decision is likely after the proposed ministerial meeting, which will also consider bringing in new provisions to deal with cases related to child abuse and male rape in case Section 377 is repealed. The meeting is being called following PM Manmohan Singh’s intervention. He had directed the ministers to resolve their differences so that the government gets a uniform view on homosexuality. The high court, too, had told the government to sort out its differences. OPENING UP
A poll of avowedly heterosexual people in eight major cities on how they view homosexuality showed that prejudices aren’t quite as firmly entrenched as many might expect. The results indicate a more liberal attitude towards gayness than in the past. The times, it appears, are changing.

A MATTER OF PRIDE

Swinging sixties

On the 40th anniversary of the Stonewall riots in New York, a look at the gay scene in India in the ’60s

Vikram Doctor | TNN



    Sunil Gupta probably shouldn’t have been there when he first saw other gay people. He was 14 or 15 years old and in the most notorious place in Delhi in the late 1960s. This was The Cellar, the first nightclub started outside a hotel, and Gupta was there as his sister’s chaperone. “I’d be given a Coke and told to sit in a corner seat,” he recalls.
    It was while sitting there that he heard people talking. “They said, did you know that guy there is gay,’’ says Gupta. He had heard about gays from magazines brought by Berkeley students who were paying guests with his family. “They had gay personals ads, and while the students weren’t gay, I could talk with them about it.’’ And now, at The Cellar, he could put faces (some still well known in Delhi, though still not out) to that term and realise there were gays living in Delhi, just as he could be too.
    The Pride marches taking place across the world this weekend commemorate the 40th anniversary of New York’s Stonewall riots which started on June 28, 1969. That night, the police raided a gay bar, a routine harassment, but this time instead of submitting, people fought back, kicking off the public struggle for queer rights. Today, it’s easy to forget that the struggle existed here too back in 1969. And impossible as Pride marches in India would have seemed then,
it was the community’s sheer existence at that time that would provide the soil from which today’s movement would spring.
    Men and men, women and women, have always been sleeping together in India, as evidenced in sources like the Khajuraho carvings, Urdu love poetry and literary references like Ismat Chughtai’s Lihaaf. The criminalisation of such practices, as brought in by the British, stifled any open growth of the community, yet it continued to exist. Police reports hint at the persecutions the community faced, yet it survived, as is shown by literary references, in sources as diverse as the sensational stories of Ugra (Pandey Bechan Sharma), Paul Scott’s Raj Quartet, and a wonderfully badly written, yet campily fun novel called The Dew Drop Inn by Leslie de Noronha, who was for years the theatre critic of Mumbai’s Catholic newsletter The Examiner. That novel paints a picture of a freewheeling gay scene in Bombay and Delhi in the ’60s, but always in private and mostly at parties.
    “It was vital to have a place of your own,’’ says S., a writer who came to Delhi in his teens. He remembers a maharajah who had a huge house in Delhi from where he made full use of his position as the Indian representative of an international sporting association. “It was really quite an exploitative scene, that was the unpleasant side to it,’’ says S.
    Foreigners were a large part of it. Many had stayed on after the Raj, usually as agents of foreign firms, enjoying the freedom their status gave them to lead a gay life they couldn’t back home. They also enjoyed the many Indian men
who preferred sleeping with foreigners, because they saw it as safer than sleeping with other Indians. By the late ’60s though, another younger type of foreigner was being seen—Peace Corps workers or the first hippies.
    Another change of the ’60s was the chance it allowed a few young people to experience gay culture in the West. This was courtesy Air India which, hard as it is to imagine now, was one of the leading, most stylish airlines in the world then. Run by worldly bosses like Bobby Kooka, it attracted many gay and bisexual men (and a few lesbians as well) to work as aircrew. Going abroad was still hard for Indians, so for the aircrew it was a great chance to experience gay life abroad. N., one of them, remembers how, on one of his first trips to the US, soon after they checked into a Manhattan hotel, two other gay crew members, who had figured him out, took him to a bathhouse where gay men met. “They went off to have fun and left me alone. I was so embarrassed it took me about three to four visits before I picked up the courage to approach someone!’’
In the years after Stonewall, N. did notice a greater openness in New York: “Before you’d take the cab to the head of the road the bathhouse was in, but later on they had no problem dropping you to the door!’’ But no change seemed forthcoming in India. Many of his gay colleagues got married, arguing that an open gay life in India was impossible, while others, like a lesbian couple he knew, emigrated. In Delhi too, S. saw gay IAS officers he knew getting married; there seemed no other option, and the sex they could always get on the side. And yet even then there were a few who resisted. B., an academic in Bangalore, cites the example of two older friends—a historian and a businessman—who never came out about their sexuality but never concealed it either and always remained friendly and supportive, but not exploitative, of younger gay men. “They really played a mentoring role to me,’’ says B. In 1990 journalist Ashok Row Kavi started Bombay Dost, India’s first gay magazine. In Delhi, a group of gays and lesbians started meeting to discuss how to start fighting for gay rights; they called themselves the Red Rose group because a flower was always kept on the table to identify it for newcomers.
In time more people would come out, more gay and lesbian books would be published, Fire would be made, attacked and defended, HIV would force government to tacitly acknowledge groups representing sexual minorities. And ultimately, in however unlikely a way, one has reached a time when both Dostana and Pride marches are possible. It is a huge change, yet it would not have been possible, here as in New York 40 years ago, without the gays and lesbians who lived their lives then.

 

http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/getimage.dll?path=TOIM/2009/06/28/5/Img/Pc0051500.jpg

 

http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Layout/Images/TOINEW/Elements/empty.gif

 

Homophobic India in dubious league

Rubs Shoulders With Hardline Islamic Nations; Even China Lifted Ban On Gay Sex In ’97

Manoj Mitta | TNN


New Delhi: If the government musters courage to decriminalise homosexuality, or if the Delhi high court effects such a change on the petition challenging Section 377 IPC, India will shed the dubious honour of being among the 10 countries that can impose life sentence for gay sex.
    This category of homophobic countries includes Pakistan, Uganda, Tanzania and Sierra Leone—not exactly the kind of company that a liberal democracy wants to keep.
    It can’t draw comfort from the fact that there is a category of eight countries that are even more illiberal as they impose capital punishment for the same offence, which is variously described as “unnatural offence”, “buggery”, “sodomy” or “serious indecency”.
    Not surprisingly, those that put their homosexuals to death are essentially hardline Islamic countries: Saudi Arabia, Iran, UAE, Yemen, Afghanistan, Sudan, Mauritania and parts of Nigeria. India would do well to be conscious of the big picture, which shows that more than half the countries in the world have by now decriminalised homosexuality and that it is among the 85 countries that have clung to the archaic ban, accompanied by various degrees of penalty.
    Its great rival, China, has left India behind in breaching this cultural barrier. For all its draconian laws, China lifted its ban on gay sex in 1997. In the much touted combine of BRIC nations, India is the only one that punishes homosexuality as, besides China, Brazil and Russia too have long crossed the rubicon.
    The situation is no less embarrassing in its south Asian neighbourhood. For, Nepal, despite all its political turmoil, turned gay-friendly in December 2007 when its Supreme Court ordered its government to scrap laws that discriminate against homosexuals. It’s a precedent worthy of being followed by the Delhi high court should the Manmohan Singh government fail to take the initiative.
    India could also draw inspiration from the activism displayed by the Obama administration in March in reversing its predecessor’s decision to withhold US support to a UN General Assembly declaration calling for decriminalisation of homosexuality. Thus, US joined 66 other countries which had supported the declaration in December 2008 condemning human rights violations based on sexual orientation and gender identity.
    Though all the states of US legalised homosexuality by 2003, the outgoing Bush administration refused to sign the declaration in December citing concerns that it would encroach on the autonomy of states to legislate on matters involving discrimination. On reviewing the policy, the Obama administration concluded that the declaration did not create any new legal obligations for US and would therefore have no effect on the existing laws in its states.
    India is out of sync with the worldwide trend of homosexuality being legalised in developing countries as well. Look at the some of the examples: Vietnam, Phillipines, Thailand and Kazakhstan in Asia, South Africa, Chad, Congo and Madagascar in Africa, Peru, Chile, Columbia and Bolivia in South America.
    The 27-nation EU has been in the vanguard of the movement to recognise the rights of LGBT (lesbians, gays, bixesuals and transgenders). France has the distinction of legalising homosexuality way back in 1791, as a sequel to its famous revolution. Its neighbour, England, lifted the ban much later in 1967. In the four decades that have lapsed since then, India has however shown little signs of doing away with the colonial relic of Section 377 IPC.
HAPPY TO BE GAY
Homophobic nations include Pak, Uganda, Tanzania and Sierra Leone Those which order death for homosexuals are hardline Islamic nations like Saudi Arabia, Iran, UAE, Yemen, Afghanistan, Sudan, Mauritania and parts of Nigeria India only one out of the BRIC group (Brazil, Russia, India and China) to punish homosexuality
    Even Nepal, ravaged by political turmoil, turned gay-friendly in December 2007
    Even nations like Vietnam, Phillipines, Thailand & Kazakhstan in Asia, Chad, Congo & Madagascar in Africa, Peru, Chile, Columbia & Bolivia in S America have legalised homosexuality

 

http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Repository/getimage.dll?path=TOIM/2009/06/28/7/Img/Pc0071100.jpg

 

http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Layout/Images/TOINEW/Elements/empty.gif

 

So what if you’re gay? For mum, son still shines

Shreya Roy Chowdhury | TNN


New Delhi: When Harvard graduate Nishit Saran “came out”, he recorded the moment for the world to see. In his short film, Summer in My Veins (1999), he falteringly admits to his mother he’s gay and has ‘been with men’. His mother looks a little taken aback; she lights a cigarette, calms herself and assures her son that nothing has changed. In those few minutes, Nishit caught on film a response that every homosexual probably wishes for when he or she comes out to a parent: acceptance and a spontaneous offering of love and support.
    Few get it but they are the fortunate ones. “I’d read about homosexuality in the papers” but never “expected it to come into the house,” says Smitha, mother of Sunil, a 26-year-old, Chennai-based activist who came out three years ago. Sunil had just registered for PhD and announced that he wanted to specialize in queer studies. Reason: he was gay and “wanted to do something for gays”. Smitha may not have been prepared, but she refused to flip out. “I told him we will always love and support him and he is never to talk about leaving home again,” she says. Sunil’s ‘friends’, are welcome: “If he selects a good partner, we’ll accept. He’s a good human being, God will look after him.”
    Nita’s son, Anuj, came out so long ago that she doesn’t even remember the circumstances. She felt “empathy”. “I felt bad that he’d been forced to keep it all to himself,” she says. Accepting him was never an issue. “Homosexuality is like being left-handed, one of the things that can happen in life.”
    ‘Coming out’ does not imply a public revelation. Children may come out to their parents—often to counter pressure for marriage—but extended family and society-at-large are kept out. So the immediate family fields questions that the boy or girl previously handled alone. “I’ve been asked when he’ll get married; relatives and friends may have guessed but we don’t discuss these things with them,” says Smitha.
    Not all parents handle the revelation with equanimity. Counselors say for most, it’s guilt and shock, pujas and prayers, followed by grudging acceptance that jostles with hope that their children will become ‘normal’ again. “Mothers feel they have done something wrong if the child turns out to be homosexual. Fathers don’t want friends and relatives to know. Both want their children married in the hope that sexual encounter with the opposite sex will fix them,” says Magdalene Jeyarathnam, Chennai-based counsellor of parents of homosexuals. She’s handling nearly one new case every week of parents trying to come to terms with their child’s sexual orientation. She recalls the case of a couple whose own relationship was souring after their son’s coming out. They blamed each other till the son suggested counselling. Jeyarathnam also says that the sons and daughters, fearing the worst, admit to their sexuality only when they can fend for themselves.
    Though the number of lesbians coming to her is far fewer the ones who do come out are more easily accepted than gays. It is the sons who bear the burden of parental expectations. A gay son who can’t perpetuate the family line seems not adequate return on investment made in his upbringing and education.
    The weight of his parents’ ambitions is what keeps 26 year-old Sutirtho Ganguly from coming out. He is an only child and parents want the ‘normal’ life for him. His is the dillemma that the entire homosexual community in the country faces.
    (Some names have been changed)

 

Email: moderator@gaybombay.in

Web Sites:

www.gaybombay.in

www.gaybombay.info

www.gayindia.org

E Groups:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gay_bombay

http://groups.google.com/group/Gaybombay


GB Internet Radio

http://www.gaybombay.in/gbradio

Gaybombay breaking news and annoucements

http://labs.google.co.in/smschannels/subscribe/Gaybombay

Emergency Helpline number 9820565885

Orkut:

http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Community.aspx?cmm=22091955 

 Blogs:

http://gaybombay.blogspot.com

http://gaybombay.wordpress.com 

Twitter

http://twitter.com/gaybombay

 

LGBT related articles in the Indian media.

Ancient India didn't think homosexuality was against nature

27 Jun 2009, 0018 hrs IST, Manoj Mitta, TNN

NEW DELHI: Was Indian society tolerant of homosexuality before the colonial administration proscribed it in 1860? The government has taken

conflicting positions on this within the country and outside

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/India/Ancient-India-didnt-think-homosexuality-was-against-nature/articleshow/4708206.cms

 

On a petition pending before the Delhi high court seeking to decriminalize homosexuality, the government said in its counter affidavit that that there were “no convincing reports to indicate that homosexuality or other offences against the order of nature mentioned in Section 377 IPC were acceptable in the Indian society prior to colonial rule.”

But when it was being reviewed by the UN Human Rights Council last year for the first time ever, India distanced itself from that provision when Sweden, arguably the most gay-friendly country in the world, questioned its record in ensuring equality irrespective of a person’s sexual orientation.

This is how Goolam Vahanvati, who was then solicitor-general and is now attorney-general, tried to save India’s face before the council as part of its official delegation. “Around the early 19th Century, you probably know that in England they frowned on homosexuality, and therefore there are historical reports that various people came to India to take advantage of its more liberal atmosphere with regard to different kinds of sexual conduct.

“As a result, in 1860 when we got the Indian Penal Code, which was drafted by Lord Macaulay, they inserted Section 377 which brought in the concept of ‘sexual offences against the order of nature’.

Now in India we didn’t have this concept of something being ‘against the order of nature’. It was essentially a Western concept, which has remained over the years. Now homosexuality as such is not defined in the IPC, and it will be a matter of great argument whether it is ‘against the order of nature’.”

Vahanvati’s admission on the international forum that the ban on homosexuality was a western import and its relevance was debatable flies in the face of the government’s unabashed efforts before the Delhi high court to retain Section 377, complete with its colonial baggage and archaic notion of unnatural offences.

Whatever the politics behind this glaring contradiction, there is ample evidence placed before the high court by petitioner Naz Foundation substantiating in effect Vahanvati’s view that in the centuries prior to the enactment of section 377, India was rather accommodating of homosexuals.

While the penalty imposed by Section 377 goes up to life sentence, there is nothing close to it in Manusmriti, the most popular Hindu law book of medieval and ancient India. “If a man has shed his semen in non-human females, in a man, in a menstruating woman, in something other than a vagina, or in water, he should carry out the ‘painful heating’ vow.” Thus, this peculiar vow, involving application of cow’s urine and dung, was meant not only for homosexuals but also errant heterosexuals.

The penalty is even milder if the homosexual belongs to an upper caste. As Manusmriti puts it, “If a twice-born man unites sexually with a man or a woman in a cart pulled by a cow, or in water, or by day, he should bathe with his clothes on.’’

Since Manusmriti was written at a time when bath generally meant taking a dip in a river or a lake with other members of the same gender, the penalty of making a homosexual bathe without taking off his clothes was probably designed to avoid the embarrassment of his being sexually aroused in public.

In another indicator of the liberal Hindu heritage, Kama Sutra, a classic written in the first millennium by Sage Vatsyayana, devotes a whole chapter to homosexual sex saying “it is to be engaged in and enjoyed for its own sake as one of the arts.” Besides providing a detailed description of oral sex between men, Kama Sutra categorizes men who desire other men as “third nature” and refers to long-term unions between men
.

‘Gay rights? It’s basic human rights’

28 Jun 2009, 0006 hrs IST, AYANDRALI DUTTA , TNN

was a simple thing – inaugurating a film festival.

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/Potpourri/Gay-rights-Its-basic-human-rights/articleshow/4709481.cms

Gay rights? It’s basic human rights

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/photo.cms?msid=3000949

Gay rights? It’s basic human rights



The difference was that it was the Queer Film Festival in Kolkata, and filmmaker Onir, the maker of My Brother Nikhil, was the one inaugurating it. Talking about gay rights on the day the capital sees its second gay parade, he says he encountered various perspectives for simply opening a film festival. “People came up with different viewpoints about it. ‘How can you go?’ some told me, ‘It’s not good for you’ – these were the remarks I got. As far as I’m concerned, I was standing for basic human rights. It was that simple. But the response was overwhelming. Seeing the number of people who turned up was really astonishing. The love I felt was enormous,” he says.

He says that My Brother Nikhil, the story of the struggle of a homosexual man dealing with AIDS, gave him his identity. His next project, titled I Am, is a compilation of five different short films. “The common theme will be fear. Characters of one film will walk into the others. Each will be treated differently in terms of cinematic styles, and will have different music directors. I’m trying out a different way of making independent films in India. One of the short films, Omar, will focus on the gigolo and police network and how they blackmail gays,” he says.
Onir reveals that the project will be funded by contributions that he gets through social networking sites. “The film will be financed by the audience,” he says.

(With inputs from Priyanka Dasgupta)

Our journey to pride

http://www.expressbuzz.com/Images/article/2009/6/23/23pride01.jpg
http://www.expressbuzz.com/edition/images/trans.gif

Mayur Suresh

First Published : 27 Jun 2009 10:12:00 AM IST

Last Updated : 26 Jun 2009 01:38:10 PM IST

 

The LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender) rights movement lays claim to a broad and diverse history. As Bangalore, Bhubaneswar, Delhi and Chennai gear up to celebrate LGBT Pride this week (Kolkata’s will be on July 5), it’s a good time to take a quick look at this history.

Many people mark the beginning of the modern LGBT rights movement with Magnus Hirschfeld (1868-1935) — a gay, German-jewish physician. In 1896, he wrote a pamphlet titled Sappho and Socrates or How to Explain the Love of Men and Women for Persons of Their Own Sex? under the pseudonym Th Ramein, which spoke about homosexual love.

In 1897 he, along with several friends, founded the Scientific Humanitarian Committee. The group aimed to undertake research to defend the rights of homosexuals and to repeal Paragraph 175, the section of the German Penal Code that since 1871 had criminalised homosexuality. In 1935, the year of Hirschfeld’s death, Nazi Germany expanded paragraph 175, and those prosecuted under the law were sent to concentration camps, and were marked by, the now iconic, pink triangle. Unlike the other prisoners, homosexual prisoners had to undergo the remainder of their sentences in prisons run by the German republic, upon the end of the second world war.

Several years later, in 1941, Ismat Chugtai, an urdu feminist writer, published her short story Lihaaf or The Quilt. The story deals with a young girl who tries to make sense of the love-making between her cloistered aunt and her aunt’s masseuse. In 1942, Ismat received summons to appear before the High Court of Lahore to answer charges of obscenity. She recounts the trial:

There was a big crowd in the court. Several people had advised us to offer our apologies to the judge, even offering to pay the fines on our behalf. The proceedings had lost some of their verve, the witnesses who were called in to prove that Lihaaf was obscene were beginning to lose their nerve in the face of our lawyer’s cross-examination. No word capable of inviting condemnation could be found.

After a great deal of searching a gentleman said, “The sentence ‘she was collecting ‘aashiqs’ (lovers) is obscene.”

“Which word is obscene,” the lawyer asked. “‘Collecting,’ or  ‘aashiqs’?”

“The word ‘aashiqs,’” the witness replied, somewhat hesitantly.

“My Lord, the word ‘aashiqs’ has been used by the greatest poets and has also been used in na‘ts. This word has been given a sacred place by the devout.”

“But it is highly improper for girls to collect ‘aashiqs,’” the witness proclaimed.

The case against Ismat was dimissed as her lawyer successfully argued that the story could not be a corrupting influence because the subject would be understood by only by someone who has had a lesbian experience.

While sex-reassignment was not unknown in 1952, Christine Jorgensen (May 30, 1926-May 3, 1989) was the first widely-known individual to have sex reassignment surgery. Born George William Jorgensen, Jr, she was drafted into the army in 1945. Unable to live in her male body, she began looking into the prospect of sex-reassignment surgery after her discha­rge from the Army. At that time, sex-reassignment surgery was illegal in most countries, and no surgeon was willing to perform the surgery in the US at that time.

Denmark was the only place George could go to have surgery, as castration was used to treat sex offenders there. Christine had her penis and testicles removed and began hormone therapy. Years later, she received a vaginoplasty in the US, when the procedure became available.

Christine contemplated marriage with John Traub, a labour union statistician, but  a license was denied by authorities in New York, as she was still legally a man.

Starting in 1966, when the The Mattachine Society (the earliest lasting homosexual organisation in the US) stages a “Sip-In” at

Julius Bar in New York City challenging a New York State Liquor Authority prohibiting serving alcohol to homosexuals, there are an increasing number of altercations between homosexuals, transgender men, and the New York City Police, culminating in the Stonewall Riots of June 29, 1969 — the event which Queer pride events around the world commemorate. That night, undercover policemen raided the Stonewall Inn in New York City, and arrested many  present in the bar. Crowds of gay men and transgender men began protesting the arrest. Riots lasted five days and from then on, it became of a symbol of Queer Pride and resistance to oppression.

In August 1992, India’s first visible event that marked the collective presence of homosexuals was a protest by the AIDS Bhedbav Virodhi Andolan in New Delhi. It highlighted the atrocities committed against homosexuals and the illegal arrest of 18 people suspected of being homosexual from a public park.

When cities across India celebrate Queer Pride this week, it’s a time not only to celebrate who we are and come out with pride, but also a time to remember how far we’ve come, and how much further we must go.

mayur.suresh@gmail.com

Orissa’s gay rally for their pride

http://www.sindhtoday.net/news/1/24638.htm

Bhubaneswar, June 27 (IANS) Nearly 150 gays and lesbians form different parts of Orissa Saturday “came out of closet” and participated in a rally here to press for their rights.

The rally named Rainbow Pride Walk was initiated by Solidarity and Action against the HIV Infection in India (SAATHI) with support of different NGOs and participated by members of LGBT (lesbian, gay, bi-sexual and transgender) from different district of the state.

“We have long been stigmatized for our sexual orientation. We were ostracized, taunted and lectured to behave in a particular way for our different sexual liking in our society. We have come out in open to press for our right,” said Subham Mishra, who is heading a support group with 500 members having alternative sexual orientation.

“We want to convey the message to the society that those with alternative sexualities and gender identities are not aberrations in society rather they are natural human feelings which is not to be despised rather they are part of the sexual diversity which is to be celebrated,” said Subham, who is a self confessed gay.

Similar rallies have been organized earlier in Kolkata, Mumbai, Delhi and Bangaluru in the past but it was a first for Bhubaneswar.

“We know that there are prejudices, stigmas attached to our sexual preferences. There is no point sweeping the problem under carpet. We need to come out of the closet to tell it openly to the world. Then we can press for protection of our rights and provide security-health, social and legal to our ilk,” said Anupam Hazra a gay right activist from Kolkata who had come to support the rally.

[LM1]

 

 

 

Email: moderator@gaybombay.in

Web Sites:

www.gaybombay.in

www.gaybombay.info

www.gayindia.org

E Groups:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/gay_bombay

http://groups.google.com/group/Gaybombay


GB Internet Radio

http://www.gaybombay.in/gbradio

Gaybombay breaking news and annoucements

http://labs.google.co.in/smschannels/subscribe/Gaybombay

Emergency Helpline number 9820565885

Orkut:

http://www.orkut.co.in/Main#Community.aspx?cmm=22091955 

 Blogs:

http://gaybombay.blogspot.com

http://gaybombay.wordpress.com 

Twitter

http://twitter.com/gaybombay